Feedback: guides-entity_redaction
Documentation Feedback
Section titled “Documentation Feedback”Original URL: https://www.assemblyai.com/docs/guides/entity_redaction
Category: guides
Generated: 05/08/2025, 4:41:19 pm
Claude Sonnet 4 Feedback
Section titled “Claude Sonnet 4 Feedback”Generated: 05/08/2025, 4:41:18 pm
Technical Documentation Analysis: Entity Redaction Guide
Section titled “Technical Documentation Analysis: Entity Redaction Guide”Overall Assessment
Section titled “Overall Assessment”This guide provides a functional walkthrough but has several areas for improvement in clarity, completeness, and user experience. Below is my detailed analysis with actionable recommendations.
🔴 Critical Issues
Section titled “🔴 Critical Issues”1. Inadequate Error Handling
Section titled “1. Inadequate Error Handling”Problem: No error handling examples or guidance Impact: Users will encounter failures without knowing how to resolve them Solution: Add comprehensive error handling section:
import assemblyai as aaifrom assemblyai.exceptions import TranscriptionError
try: transcript = transcriber.transcribe(audio_url, config) if transcript.status == aai.TranscriptStatus.error: print(f"Transcription failed: {transcript.error}") returnexcept TranscriptionError as e: print(f"API Error: {e}")except Exception as e: print(f"Unexpected error: {e}")2. Missing Performance Context
Section titled “2. Missing Performance Context”Problem: No mention of processing time, costs, or limitations Impact: Users can’t plan implementation properly Solution: Add section on:
- Typical processing times
- Cost implications of entity detection
- File size/duration limits
- Rate limiting considerations
🟡 Structure & Organization Issues
Section titled “🟡 Structure & Organization Issues”3. Confusing Flow Between Quickstart and Step-by-Step
Section titled “3. Confusing Flow Between Quickstart and Step-by-Step”Problem: Code is repeated without clear differentiation Recommendation:
- Make Quickstart a complete, minimal example
- Use Step-by-Step for detailed explanation with additional features
- Add clear transitions: “The quickstart above shows the basic flow. Let’s break this down step-by-step and explore additional options.”
4. Weak Introduction
Section titled “4. Weak Introduction”Problem: Doesn’t clearly explain when to use this vs. built-in PII redaction Solution: Add comparison table:
| Feature | Entity Detection Method | Built-in PII Redaction |
|---|---|---|
| Flexibility | High - custom entity selection | Limited - predefined PII types |
| Original text preservation | ✅ Both versions available | ❌ Original lost |
| Performance | Slower - post-processing required | Faster - handled during transcription |
| Use case | Custom redaction policies | Standard PII compliance |
🟡 Missing Information
Section titled “🟡 Missing Information”5. Incomplete Entity Type Documentation
Section titled “5. Incomplete Entity Type Documentation”Problem: Users don’t know what entity types are available Solution: Add comprehensive list with examples:
# Available entity types and examplesSUPPORTED_ENTITIES = { 'person_name': 'John Smith, Mary Johnson', 'location': 'New York, California, Main Street', 'organization': 'Google, Microsoft, FBI', 'phone_number': '555-123-4567, (555) 123-4567', 'email_address': 'user@example.com', 'date': 'January 1st, 2023-01-01', 'nationality': 'American, Canadian', 'event': 'World War II, Olympics', 'language': 'English, Spanish', 'occupation': 'doctor, engineer, teacher'}6. No Audio Requirements Section
Section titled “6. No Audio Requirements Section”Solution: Add section covering:
- Supported audio formats
- Quality requirements for accurate entity detection
- File size limits
- URL vs. local file handling
🟡 Code Quality Issues
Section titled “🟡 Code Quality Issues”7. Unsafe String Replacement Logic
Section titled “7. Unsafe String Replacement Logic”Problem: replace() method can cause incorrect replacements
Example: If transcript contains “John” and “Johnson”, replacing “John” first corrupts “Johnson”
Solution: Provide safer replacement method:
def safe_redact_entities(text, entities): """Safely redact entities by replacing from end to beginning""" # Sort entities by start position (descending) to avoid position shifts sorted_entities = sorted(entities, key=lambda x: x.start, reverse=True)
redacted_text = text for entity in sorted_entities: start, end = entity.start, entity.end replacement = f"[{entity.entity_type.upper()}]" redacted_text = redacted_text[:start] + replacement + redacted_text[end:]
return redacted_text8. Hardcoded Values
Section titled “8. Hardcoded Values”Problem: API key and URLs are hardcoded Solution: Show environment variable usage:
import osimport assemblyai as aai
# Better: Use environment variablesaai.settings.api_key = os.getenv('ASSEMBLYAI_API_KEY')if not aai.settings.api_key: raise ValueError("Please set ASSEMBLYAI_API_KEY environment variable")🟡 User Experience Issues
Section titled “🟡 User Experience Issues”9. Inadequate Examples
Section titled “9. Inadequate Examples”Problem: Only one audio file example, limited use cases Solution: Add multiple scenarios:
- Medical transcription redaction
- Legal document processing
- Customer service call redaction
- Different input methods (local files, streaming)
10. No Validation Guidance
Section titled “10. No Validation Guidance”Problem: Users can’t verify redaction worked correctly Solution: Add validation section:
def validate_redaction(original_entities, redacted_text): """Validate that all specified entities were redacted""" failed_redactions = [] for entity in original_entities: if entity.text.lower() in redacted_text.lower(): failed_redactions.append(entity)
if failed_redactions: print(f"Warning: {len(failed_redactions)} entities not redacted") for entity in failed_redactions: print(f" - {entity.text} ({entity.entity_type})") return len(failed_redactions) == 0🟢 Positive Aspects
Section titled “🟢 Positive Aspects”- Clear code formatting
- Good use of real audio example
- Practical filtering example
- Helpful disclaimer about local-only redaction
📋 Implementation Priority
Section titled “📋 Implementation Priority”High Priority:
- Add error handling examples
- Fix unsafe string replacement
- Document available entity types
- Add performance/cost context
Medium Priority: 5. Improve introduction with comparison table 6. Add validation methods 7. Show environment variable usage 8. Restructure quickstart vs. step-by-step
Low Priority: 9. Add multiple use case examples 10. Expand audio requirements section
This analysis should significantly improve the documentation’s clarity, safety, and user experience.