Feedback: guides-make-speaker-labels
Documentation Feedback
Section titled “Documentation Feedback”Original URL: https://www.assemblyai.com/docs/guides/make-speaker-labels
Category: guides
Generated: 05/08/2025, 4:39:29 pm
Claude Sonnet 4 Feedback
Section titled “Claude Sonnet 4 Feedback”Generated: 05/08/2025, 4:39:28 pm
Technical Documentation Analysis & Feedback
Section titled “Technical Documentation Analysis & Feedback”Overall Assessment
Section titled “Overall Assessment”This guide provides a functional walkthrough but lacks the depth and clarity needed for effective technical documentation. Here’s my detailed analysis with actionable improvements:
🚨 Critical Issues
Section titled “🚨 Critical Issues”1. Missing Prerequisites & Setup
Section titled “1. Missing Prerequisites & Setup”Problem: Users don’t know what they need before starting.
Fix: Add a prerequisites section:
## Prerequisites- Active Make.com account (Basic plan or higher)- AssemblyAI API key ([get one here](link))- Google account with Google Drive access- Audio file URL (supported formats: MP3, WAV, M4A, etc.)- Basic familiarity with Make.com scenarios2. Incomplete Configuration Details
Section titled “2. Incomplete Configuration Details”Problem: Critical settings are mentioned but not explained.
Fix: Provide specific configuration examples:
### AssemblyAI Module Configuration- **Audio URL**: `https://example.com/audio.mp3`- **Speaker Labels**: ✅ Enabled (required for this guide)- **Language Detection**: Auto-detect (recommended)- **Additional Models** (optional): - Sentiment Analysis - Entity Detection - Content Moderation🔧 Structure & Organization Issues
Section titled “🔧 Structure & Organization Issues”3. Inconsistent Step Format
Section titled “3. Inconsistent Step Format”Problem: Some steps have clear headers, others don’t. Inconsistent detail levels.
Fix: Standardize all steps:
## Step X: [Action Name]### What you'll do:Brief explanation of the step's purpose
### Instructions:1. Numbered action items2. With specific details
### Expected Result:What users should see after completion
### Troubleshooting:Common issues and solutions4. Missing Error Handling
Section titled “4. Missing Error Handling”Problem: No guidance for common failures.
Fix: Add troubleshooting sections:
## Common Issues & Solutions
### "Failed to load" Error in Google Docs Module- **Cause**: Authentication timeout- **Solution**: Reconnect your Google account in Make.com settings- **Prevention**: Re-authenticate every 30 days
### Transcript Processing Timeout- **Cause**: Large audio files (>2 hours)- **Solution**: Use webhook triggers for long files- **Alternative**: Split audio into smaller segments📝 Content & Clarity Issues
Section titled “📝 Content & Clarity Issues”5. Vague Instructions
Section titled “5. Vague Instructions”Problem: “Add some filler content” and similar non-specific directions.
Fix: Provide exact examples:
### Document Setup- **Document Name**: `Speaker Analysis - [Current Date]`- **Initial Content**:Audio Transcript with Speaker Labels
Section titled “Audio Transcript with Speaker Labels”Generated on: {{formatDate(now; “YYYY-MM-DD”)}}
- **Location**: Choose your preferred Google Drive folder6. Missing Format Explanation
Section titled “6. Missing Format Explanation”Problem: The “format below” is referenced but not clearly shown.
Fix: Provide explicit formatting template:
### Text Formatting TemplateUse this exact format in the "Appended Text" field:Speaker {{speaker}}: {{text}} Confidence: {{confidence}}%
Section titled “Speaker {{speaker}}: {{text}} Confidence: {{confidence}}%”**Result Example:**Speaker A: Hello, welcome to today’s meeting. Confidence: 95%
Section titled “Speaker A: Hello, welcome to today’s meeting. Confidence: 95%”Speaker B: Thank you for having me. Confidence: 92%
Section titled “Speaker B: Thank you for having me. Confidence: 92%”## 🎯 User Experience Improvements
### 7. **Add Estimated Time & Complexity**```markdown## Guide Overview- **Estimated Time**: 15-20 minutes- **Difficulty Level**: Intermediate- **Cost**: ~$0.50 per hour of audio (AssemblyAI pricing)8. Include Validation Steps
Section titled “8. Include Validation Steps”Problem: Users don’t know if they’re on track.
Fix: Add checkpoints:
### ✅ Validation CheckpointAfter Step 3, verify:- [ ] Transcript status shows "completed"- [ ] Utterances array contains speaker data- [ ] Speaker labels are populated (not null)
**If any item fails**: [Troubleshooting steps]9. Missing Next Steps & Extensions
Section titled “9. Missing Next Steps & Extensions”Problem: Guide ends abruptly without follow-up possibilities.
Fix: Add conclusion section:
## Next StepsNow that you have speaker labels working, you can:- **Export to other formats**: CSV, JSON, or email- **Add sentiment analysis**: Combine with emotion detection- **Automate processing**: Set up file watchers for batch processing- **Enhance formatting**: Add timestamps and confidence scores
## Related Guides- [Adding Timestamps to Transcripts](link)- [Batch Processing Audio Files](link)- [Advanced Speaker Diarization](link)📊 Technical Accuracy Issues
Section titled “📊 Technical Accuracy Issues”10. Missing API Limits & Considerations
Section titled “10. Missing API Limits & Considerations”## Important Limitations- **File Size**: Maximum 512MB per file- **Processing Time**: ~15% of audio duration- **Speaker Detection**: Works best with 2-10 speakers- **Audio Quality**: Higher quality = better speaker accuracy- **Language Support**: Speaker labels available for English, Spanish, French, German🔍 SEO & Discoverability
Section titled “🔍 SEO & Discoverability”11. Improve Title & Meta Information
Section titled “11. Improve Title & Meta Information”Current: “Iterate over Speaker Labels with Make.com” Better: “How to Extract Speaker Labels from Audio Using AssemblyAI and Make.com”
12. Add Search-Friendly Headings
Section titled “12. Add Search-Friendly Headings”Include keyword variations:
- “Speaker Diarization”
- “Audio Transcription Automation”
- “Voice Recognition Workflow”
Summary of Priority Fixes
Section titled “Summary of Priority Fixes”- High Priority: Add prerequisites, fix configuration details, include error handling
- Medium Priority: Standardize step format, add validation checkpoints
- Low Priority: Improve SEO, add next steps section
These improvements would transform this from a basic walkthrough into comprehensive, user-friendly documentation that reduces support requests and improves user success rates.