Skip to content

Feedback: lemur-ask-questions

Original URL: https://www.assemblyai.com/docs/lemur/ask-questions
Category: lemur
Generated: 05/08/2025, 4:29:46 pm


Generated: 05/08/2025, 4:29:45 pm

Technical Documentation Analysis: LeMUR Q&A Guide

Section titled “Technical Documentation Analysis: LeMUR Q&A Guide”

This documentation provides comprehensive code examples but has several areas for improvement in clarity, structure, and user experience. Here’s my detailed feedback:

  1. Cost information: No mention of pricing, token usage, or billing implications
  2. Rate limits: Missing API rate limiting details and best practices
  3. Error handling: Limited error scenarios and troubleshooting guidance
  4. Response time expectations: No SLA or typical processing times mentioned
  5. Audio file limitations: Missing file size, format, and duration constraints
  6. Model comparison: No guidance on when to use different models
  • Authentication troubleshooting: No guidance for API key issues
  • Webhook support: No mention of async processing options
  • Batch processing: Missing information about handling multiple files
  • Regional availability: No mention of geographic restrictions
  1. “LeMUR” - Never explained what the acronym stands for or its purpose
  2. “final_model” parameter - Unclear why it’s called “final” and what alternatives exist
  3. Context vs. Prompt distinction - The difference isn’t clearly explained
  • The relationship between transcription and Q&A steps could be clearer
  • Missing explanation of how the underlying transcript provides context
  1. Single question focus: Most examples use only one simple question
  2. Generic scenarios: Examples don’t show real-world business use cases
  3. Limited output variety: Missing examples of different response formats
## Real-World Examples
### Customer Service Analysis
```python
prompt = """
Analyze this customer service call and answer:
1. What was the main issue reported?
2. Was the issue resolved? (Yes/No)
3. What was the customer's satisfaction level? (Scale 1-5)
4. List any follow-up actions mentioned
"""
questions = [
{
"question": "What decisions were made in this meeting?",
"answer_format": "bulleted list"
},
{
"question": "Who are the action item owners?",
"answer_format": "name: action item pairs"
}
]
## 🏗️ **Improved Structure**
### Recommended Organization
```markdown
# Ask Questions About Your Audio Data
## Overview
- What is LeMUR Q&A
- Use cases and benefits
- Prerequisites and costs
## Quick Start (5-minute guide)
- Simple example with explanation
- Expected output
## Methods Comparison
| Method | Best For | Pros | Cons |
|--------|----------|------|------|
| Basic Task | Custom prompts | Flexible | Requires prompt engineering |
| Q&A Endpoint | Structured questions | No prompt engineering | Less flexible |
## Detailed Implementation
- Basic Q&A
- Specialized endpoint
- Advanced examples
## Best Practices
- Prompt optimization
- Error handling
- Performance tips
## Troubleshooting
- Common errors
- Debug strategies
  1. Overwhelming code examples: 6+ language tabs make the page hard to scan

    • Solution: Default to Python SDK, collapse others
  2. Missing prerequisites checklist:

    ## Before You Begin
    - [ ] AssemblyAI account with credit card
    - [ ] API key configured
    - [ ] Audio file under 5GB
    - [ ] Supported audio format (MP3, WAV, etc.)
  3. No success validation: Users don’t know if their implementation worked correctly

    • Solution: Add “Verify Your Setup” section
  4. Error handling gaps: Code examples don’t show how to handle failures

    # Add this to examples
    try:
    result = transcript.lemur.task(prompt)
    print(result.response)
    except Exception as e:
    print(f"LeMUR processing failed: {e}")
    # Check transcript quality, try simpler prompt, etc.
  1. Add cost warning box:

    <Warning>
    LeMUR operations consume credits based on audio length and model choice.
    See [pricing page] for current rates.
    </Warning>
  2. Create a decision tree:

    ## Which Method Should I Use?
    - **Simple questions about content** → Q&A Endpoint
    - **Custom analysis or formatting** → Task Endpoint
    - **Multiple structured questions** → Q&A Endpoint with question arrays
  3. Add troubleshooting section:

    ## Common Issues
    | Error | Cause | Solution |
    |-------|-------|----------|
    | "Insufficient credits" | Account billing | Add payment method |
    | "Transcript not found" | Invalid transcript_id | Check transcription status |
    | "Poor quality response" | Unclear prompt | See prompt engineering guide |
  1. Interactive elements:

    • Add “Try it” buttons linking to a playground
    • Include expected processing times
    • Show token usage estimates
  2. Progressive disclosure:

    • Start with SDK examples (simpler)
    • Move raw API calls to expandable sections
    • Group advanced options separately
  3. Better cross-references:

    • Link to specific error codes documentation
    • Reference related features (summarization, etc.)
    • Connect to prompt engineering best practices

This documentation would benefit significantly from user testing to identify real-world pain points and usage patterns.